BOSTON
PUBLIC
LIBRARY
681
■ i ■
1 1 i S*
NK;
• ■ ■
■ ■ /jsf
^5r
H
■
'.>'?^
I *
MR
. ' A I Jt «<
<«*<•
B
■
:-..?•';.
XV
A!f
1 1 IfHi H «iiS H I
■ H 9 IS I
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Board of Higher Education
Division of Immigration and Americanization
.
FIFTIETH
ANNUAL REPORT
July 1, 1966-June 30, 1967
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Winthrop S. Dakin, Chairman
Amherst, Mass.
Bernard J. O'Keefe, Vice Chairman
Natick, Mass.
Gene P. Grillo
Joseph P. He ale y
Patrick J. King
Roger L. Putnam, Sr.
Daniel C. Rich
Margaret Spengler
Frieda S. Ullian
Esther S. Yntema
Hon. Sherwood J. Tarlow
Bradford, Mass.
Arlington, Mass.
Brighton, Mass.
Petersham, Mass.
Worcester, Mass.
Arlington, Mass.
Newton Center, Mass.
Cambridge, Mass.
Swampscott, Mass.
DIVISION OF IMMIGRATION AND AMERICANIZATION
MAIN OFFICE
BOSTON, MASS.
Room 208, Tremont Building
73 Tremont Street
Telephone: CApitol 7-0719
Supervisor of social Service
Mrs. Teofilia K. Tattan
BRANCH OFFICES
FALL RIVER, MASS.
51 Franklin Street
Telephone: OSborne 2-7762
District Immigration Agent
Daniel J. Donahue
LAWRENCE, MASS.
Room 308-309, Blakeley Building
477 Essex Street
Telephone: MUrdock 2-2877
District Immigration Agent
Andrew W. Ansara
SPRINGFIELD, MASS.
State Office Building
235 Chestnut Street
Telephone: REpublic 4-1018
District Immigration Agent
John A. Mclnnes
WORCESTER, MASS.
Room 401-402, Park Building
507 Main Street
Telephone: PLeasant 5-6815
District Immigration Agent
Edmund B. Meduski
Publication #270 Approved by Alfred C. Holland - State Purchasing Agent
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2012 with funding from
Boston Public Library
http://archive.org/details/annualreportofdi1967mass
REPORT OF THE
DIVISION OF IMMIGRATION AND AMERICANIZATION
FOR THE YEAR
JULY 1, 1966 TO JUNE 30, 1967
OUR GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY^ 2 i 1 I 1
This year brings to a close fifty years of service the Division of Immi-
gration and Americanization has been rendering in the Commonwealth in "bring-
ing into sympathetic and mutually helpful relations the Commonwealth and its
residents of foreign origin, and generally promote their assimilation and
and naturalization." Established in 1917 as the Bureau of Immigration, in
1919 it became the Division of Immigration and Americanization as part of the
Department of Education. Its duties and functions have remained the same
through the years. One million six hundred and ten thousand services have
been given through our offices which are located in Boston, Fall River,
Lawrence, Springfield and Worcester. Our records show 16,981 services in
1920 with steady increases shown and the fiscal year ending June 30, 1966 a
total of 45,034. Our largest amount of services recorded was in 1940 -
53,633 - the year of the initiation of the Alien Registration Act» .The work
of the Division is intensified and varied with world situations and economics
of war, depression and enactment of various immigration, citizenship and
general welfare laws.
In a state which ranks 7th in the number of aliens with 40% of the popu-
lation of "foreign stock" as defined in the 1960 United states census reports
(foreign born persons and those with foreign born parents) denotes the mute
testimony of the far-reaching and great demand for our services,
NUMBER OF SERVICES
Of the 45,034 services recorded in our statistics this year, the Boston
Off ice shows 23,984; Fall River - 4,394; Lawrence - 7,243; Springfield -
3,832 and Worcester - 5,581. Of the total services 10,000 concerned immigra-
tion matters, no doubt because of the Immigration Act of 1965. Helping in
reunion of families and giving information regarding labor clearances requir-
ed which are now in so many cases, was a great part of these services.
REUNION OF FAMILIES
The Act of October 5, 1965, granting nonquota status to parents of
United States citizens, and second preference category to unmarried children
of aliens, as well as making more numbers available in the fifth preference
category for brothers and sisters, has reunited many families. However in
Massachusetts where we have a large Italian population, for many there are
brothers and sisters waiting on the lists since 1955 for their turns to come.
For a number of these who might qualify as skilled workers, we have assisted
in filing applications with necessary translations of documents to show .
skills, in hope of earlier issuance of visas.
Assistance in filing petitions for brothers and sisters in countries as
Ireland and England where the quota is current, has increased. Formerly, we
were instrumental in making the affidavits of support in behalf of these
relatives and their visa applications were issued on this basis. Now, be-
cause of the labor clearance requirement and because the prospective employee
is not physically present in the United states, it has been difficult to get
employers, their immediate relatives are petitioning for preference category.
The visa petition activity shows a tremendous upswing* United States
citizens and lawful permanent resident aliens who previously had refrained
from petitioning for close relatives because of the previous hopeless-looking
quota situation in many instances, are now encouraged to file such petitions.
Parents arriving in the United States from Italy, Greece and Portugal, who
have adult children remaining abroad, have called at our offices within a few
days of their arrival, in possession of the proper documents, prepared to
file petitions for them.
Since the Act of October 1965 further provided to have mentally retarded
children join their families, to our knowledge five families were able to
comply with all requirements to have reunions in the United States, One, a
young Italian girl of 18, whose citizen parents and brothers were well-estab-
lished apple orchard farmers, is happily engaged in helping out on the farm.
Also we have particularly noted that under the several new provisions in
the laws, Chinese parents have joined their children from Hong Kong; a number
of them in the past year have adjusted to permanent residents as they had
come as refugees, and even brothers and sisters of citizens have arrived from
abroad in the past year.
LABOR CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
For the many for whom it is necessary to have labor clearances to come
to the United States, there are a number of obstacles. For many of the
Canadian relatives, our clients have found that without the personal presence
of the applicant, it is difficult to get employer sponsorship. Then for
those who are willing to file the labor clearance, when told of the months
before final issuance of visa is made and arrival of employee to start work-
ing, many of the employers have refused to complete the process.
Application for preferential status in this area, filed with the U. S.
Immigration Service for either the third or sixth preference, because of the
backlog of work, takes many months for action.
The "live-in maid" applications seem to be as numerous as ever. Many
are for persons in the West Indies. The majority have stayed at their jobs
on arrival, but in a number of cases there has been dissatisfaction expressed
because of living distance away from the city, or the desire to change to
1966 NEW ARRIVALS
Of the 15,120 immigrants destined to Massachusetts for the year 1966,
persons came from the following countries:
Canada . 2,092
Italy 1,815
United Kingdom 1,149
Greece 772
Poland 636
China 486
Germany 450
Denmark, Norway, Sweden 238
Cuba 227
Colombia 147
Argentina 87
Haiti 71
Dominican Republic 67
Japan 66
Eduador 59
Philippines 59
Mexico 34
Yugoslavia 28 etc.
As compared to the preceding year, some 3,000 less came from Canada,
United Kingdom, Germany. An increase is shown notably in those from Italy,
Greece, Portugal, Poland, China, no doubt due to the law of October 1965
which established the pool for fifth preference permitting more brothers
and sisters in the quota. Also, since parents from those countries are now
nonquota, many of them, immediately on arrival into the United States, have
been able to petition for second preference category for their unmarried
adult children who are able to join them soon.
OTHER IMMIGRATION PROBLEMS
The charts attached show the many aspects of services given in many
phases of assistance to assimilation of the many foreign born persons in the
Commonwealth. Adjustment of status to residents - other than Cubans - con-
cerned 357 cases. A number of these were visitors in the United States who
had married citizens in the United States and could apply without leaving
the country under Section 245 of the Immigration Law. Five were Gree'< seamen
for whom it was necessary to initiate action at some Consul abroad after the
grant of voluntary departure by the U. S. Immigration Officials. This in-
volved much correspondence, filing of papers, translation of records and
final appointment from the Consul before departure abroad for the visa. A
number of these were for persons from the West Indies who had come on a visit
to the United States and then married United States citizens. The Consuls in
Canada have been able to expedite action in these cases and the United States
Immigration Service has been most generous in extending the time in the
United States of such persons under immigration proceedings until such time
as an appointment is given by the Consul.
another type of work. In the case of the "domestic" who, on arrival, did not
report to work to the employer for whom the labor clearance was granted but
went to work in a factory, she came under immigration proceedings and the
special inquiry officer found that she was excludable at entry because of
lack of valid labor certificate. However, she was granted voluntary depar-
ture, is getting a labor clearance for her preferred work and is hoping to
return to the United States as a resident again.
There is no doubt that the labor clearance requirement has proven to be
a hardship and caused a decrease in the number of persons . entering the United
States particularly from Canada and countries of the Western Hemisphere.
RECENT IMMIGRATION
From the United States Immigration Service Annual Report, it is noted
that from 1965 to 1966, 323,040 immigrants were admitted to the United States
of whom 126,310 were subject to numerical limitation. This is an increase of
26,343 immigrants from the last year, the largest number since fiscal 1957,
and before that 1927 which is due, no doubt, to the laws permitting reunion
of families.
Of the 323,040 immigrants, 10,000 or more had as place of intended resi-
dence the following states:
State Number of Immigrants
New York 77,279
California 73,073
Illinois 18,158
New Jersey 17,667
Massachusetts 15,120
Florida 14,028
Texas 13,742
In the past ten years, 119,661 immigrants came to Massachusetts of the
total 2,879,388 immigrants admitted to the United States in that time.
1966 15,120
1965 11,455
1964 12,650
1963 13,571
1962 11,578
1961 12,091
1960 11,953
1959 • 9,855
1958 10,128
1957 11,260
CUBANS
The enactment of P.L. 89-732 on November 2, 1966 which provides for
adjustment of the Cuban Parolees in the United states to that of permanent
residents, shows an increase of services to persons of this nationality. We
filed 500 applications in behalf of such Cubans in the past year which
acoounted for at least 90% of the applications for such adjustment at the
United States Immigration Office in Boston. We were fortunate to have the
services of two Social Workers who, with their ability to speak and translate
Spanish, expedited such applications. Personal documents are part of the
applications. In translation services of 2,166 recorded this year, more than
half of this number is for Spanish documents.
The annual alien registration report lists 2,500 Cuban nationals in this
Commonwealth, but an estimate of 6,000 is given by the various groups con-
cerned with such persons.
Massachusetts has the average group of Cubans; professional and other-
wise. A great number are in clerical and sales categories and there are
semi-skilled and unskilled working in hospitals and restaurants. Only two
cases locally are known to be recipients of Public welfare assistance and
many are advancing into their professional fields as accountants, teachers
and dentists.
For a number of those whom we assisted in filling the applications for
family reunions through the airlifts, Castro has not permitted departure. A
United States citizen mother still waits for her 15 year old daughter as she
has been doing for the past four years. Because a sister is in jail as a
political prisoner, the rest of the family of the young man who had arrived
by a small boat from Cuba, still waits.
For many of the relatives we are now assisting in making the necessary
applications with pleas to the Mexican Government for temporary entrance from
Cuba and thus to the United States. A number of the relatives still are able
to go to Spain from Cuba, with living expenses provided by the established
relative in the United States. We then assist in making the necessary affi-
davits of support, etc., for parents, with information and procedures in
getting labor clearances for brothers and sisters for final issuance of
visas for reunion with their relatives.
Already we have helped a number of Cubans in applications for United
States citizenship and so, for many, Massachusetts is home without tfe<3
mobility of the unsettled person.
OTHER FAMILY REUNIONS
We note also an increase of clientele from the independent countries,
Costa Rica; Dominican Republic; Guatemala and the West Indies. Many of them
had come as domestic "live -ins" with labor clearance and now come to us for
assistance in filing forms to have their husbands and minor children come to
the United States.
It should be noted also that for some 42 applicants seeking to bring
relatives from U.S. S. R. we have made the "Vyzov" made in English and the
Russian languages. After proper notarization and legalization by the Secre-
tary of the Commonwealth and authentication by the Department of State, it is
sent to the relative in U.S.S*R, to present to officials for the permit to
depart. Some 10 persons, to our knowledge, were successful in getting to
this State in the past year. All seem to be given permit to visit for three
months.
Of those admitted for permanent residence, a mother from Lithuania who
had left many grandchildren behind and is now with a daughter who had been
separated from her since 1942 and is not happy in being apart from those with
whom she had recent closer association. She may return. The father from
Estonia and the sister who had spent years in Siberia are well adjusted and
happy in their new home.
Amazingly now with the Polish nonpreference quota being available, many
of our applicants have been successful in getting job clearances through the
Labor Office which are being sent abroad for action for young nieces and
nephews.
• ..." !
ALIEN REGISTRATION
In 1967, 3,668,836 aliens reported under the Alien Address Program. Of
these 3,210,768 were permanent residents. The states with the largest number
of permanent resident aliens registering were:
California 808,240
, New York 558,777
Texas 230,348
Illinois < 213,104
Florida 112,703
(208,529 temporary - no doubt
because of Cubans)
New Jersey 164,943
Massachusetts 131,489
Michigan 129,482
ALIENS IN MASSACHUSETTS
131,489 were permanent residents so that Massachusetts is seventh in
the United States with number of resident aliens or 4% of the total popula-
tion. The nationality of these is:
EUROPE -'- — -81,003
Albania _ ' '/\ ..;.., 434
Austria 600
Belgium 265
Bulgaria 37
Czechoslovakia 158
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Netherlands
No rway
Poland
Portugal
Rumania
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
U.S.S.R.
Yugoslavia
Other Europe
243
38
1,043
1,918
- 4,361
4,153
382
6,006
13,812
661
2,394
12
1,401
522
8,450
18,136
139
291
889
386
642
11,684
1,681
174
91
ASIA
China
2,246
India
385
Indonesia
20
Iran
167
Iraq
28
Israel
361
Japan
485
Jordan
102
Korea
262
Lebanon
529
Pakistan
29
Palestine
23
Philippines
293
Other Asia
321
5,251
Canada
Mexico
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Haiti
Jamaica
Trinidad & Tobago
Costa Rica
El Salvador
35,231
237
2 , 500
252
242
361
64
240
42
39,855
Guatemala 147
Honduras 261
Nicaragua 30
Panama 248
*- SOUTH AMERICA 2,746
Argentina 585
Brazil 688
Chile 82
Colombia 684
Ecuador 199
Peru 220
Venezuela 174
Other South America ..; 113
AFRICA - — —471
Morocco 13
South Africa . 165
Tunisia 24
U.A.R. (Egypt) 195
Other Africa 74
OCEANIA 365
Australia 292
New Zealand 71
Other Oceania 2
STATELESS ---> 1,102
ALL OTHER '— 696
CITIZENSHIP
The United States Report shows that in 1966 124,178 persons were natura-
lized in the United States. Of the persons naturalized 46,536 were males
and 56,523 females. Their median age was 33.2. The states where the largest
number were naturalized were as follows:
New York 22,971
California 19,830
Illinois 7,451
New Jersey 7,188
Texas 4,694
Massachusetts 4,304
Pennsylvania 3,467
Florida 3,189
Ohio 3,133
Michigan 3,132
The nationalities of persons naturalized in Massachusetts:
Italy 724
Portugal 631
Canada 568
Germany. 326 v
Ireland 364 *
United Kingdom 313
Greece . 275
Poland 132 etc.
In our offices we filled 1,772 applications for petitions for naturali-
zation last year. With the addition now of form G-325A, all applications
take considerable time. No longer is it required for persons to be citizens
to qualify for old age assistance or benefits, but occasionally there is the
elderly widow who is anxious to be a citizen to get into the housing project
for which United States citizenship is required. Only lack of initiative
and fear of not qualifying had prevented her from applying earlier; A number
who had just the required residence have attended classes and have been able
to become citizens because their incentive was that they could then petition
for fourth preference category for their married children and have them
reunited in the United States.
OUR BOOKLET
Yearly we have printed at least 10,000 booklets "Questions and Answers
in Preparation for Naturalization Examination" which has been of great assis-
tance to the applicants for citizenship. Each person applying for citizen-
ship is given a copy and we distribute it to public school classes in
citizenship, civic clubs, etc.
IMPORTANT CITIZENSHIP CASE RULING
The far-reaching decision in AFROYIM v RUSK case which reversed the
ruling that United States Citizenship was lost by voting in a. foreign politi-
cal election, has affected a number of our Italian born clients who had come
to the United States with Italian passports. For several we have filed
petitions as citizens in behalf of their children left abroad. I believe
that there are many more persons in Massachusetts who had been refused U. S.
passports because they voted in foreign elections who will now have their
U. S. citizenship recognized. In addition, persons refused passports on the
ground that they lost their nationality under other provisions of the statute
may also continue to be citizens if the- loss of citizenship was not a volun-
tary relinquishment as loss of nationality by naturalization in a foreign
state; a formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state; serving in the
Armed Forces of a foreign state; accepting employment under a foreign govern-
ment if foreign nationality is obtained or if the employment requires a
declaration of foreign allegiance.
~ OTHER CITIZENSHIP PROBLEMS
There are still with us the persons who have lived in the United States
so long and know very little about their entry as they came as children and
for whom assistance must be given in getting evidence of residence prior to
July 1, 1924. It is satisfying to the worker when, after much correspondence
and ferreting of old records of assessors records, police listings, the
application filed and granted, the person is naturalized. Eighteen such
persons were assisted.
For those acquiring citizenship through parents, we assisted them in
filing 376 applications for Certificate of Derivative Citizenship. 133
persons had lost their naturalization certificates so application had to be
made for a duplicate one; 121 persons needed to get Declarations of Intention,
required of them for employment purposes or to take medical or insurance
examinations in this State,
United States citizenship is a prized possession and even though many
have heard of the ruling that United States naturalized persons do not lose
their citizen :' * -* by protracted residence abroad, inquiries are often made
for elderly people desiring to return to their country of birth.
With the conveniently available evening classes for English and Citizen-
ship in this state, it has been an incentive for the newcomer to apply for
citizenship as soon as possible after the necessary residence pcriod.'as Ji<a"i5
batter qualified.
NEWCOMERS
Our records show that 2,712 new arrivals from abroad have contacted us
in various problems. Some are for general information of change of address
notification, draft board locations, employment opportunities, evening
classes, nonpayment of wages by employer, as well as assistance in procedures
in application for family reunions. Our contacts with these persons are
either through their relatives whom we had previously helped, or in answer to
our letter of welcome and offer of assistance which is sent to each family
arriving in Massachusetts as we receive these records.
COOPERATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
We are glad to be the clearing house of information and referral to many
social agencies sending clients to us. We answer many telephone inquiries
as well. The cooperative spirit with the adult class principals and teachers
is mutually beneficial. The courteous and prompt assistance from the U. S.
Immigration Service is most gratifying «as we are mutually involved in so
many cases.
In noting the first year under the Immigration Act of October 5, 1965,
for the first time the AMERICAN IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP CONFERENCE was
held in Boston in December 1966 with many sponsoring agencies of which we
were one. The one day conference with Senator Kennedy as the main speaker
was most suffessful with some 2,000 attending.
THE FUTURE
A number of changes have already been made in easing barriers and
expediting the approval of the required labor clearances. However, many
discriminations still exist in the immigration law and many are of the
opinion that legally admitted aliens could establish preference for their
parents; that certain preference privileges should be accorded relatives of
Astern Hemisphere as is for relatives in other countries.
The Commission, established to study the ceilings on Western Hemisphere
Immigration, is seeking an extension of a year for their report and further
action. Bills of various aspects on immigration, as well as to ease natura-
lization examination requirements, have been introduced into Congress. Al-
though the Act of October 3, 1965 has made more family reunions possible, in
cases of Italians where brothers and sisters in the fifth preference category
who are waiting since prior to March 1955, has received the consideration of
at least one Senator who promises introduction of legislation to help this
situation.
As in the past fifty years, this Division continues to serve and help
not only the individual clients, but benefits communities and the Common-
wealth by assisting the many persons of foreign background to become an
integral part of the Community, State and County by voting, participation in
and becoming part of the American Way of Life.
WORCESTER OFFICE
"Welcome to Worcester! BienvenidoJ Bonne AriveJ Haz GeldinJ KangeiJ Sen
Sib CiJ" quoting a flyer from the International Center mentioning this is
what they try to say to five hundred students, doctors and their families
who come from over seventy different countries each year to study, work and
also to impart their knowledge and skills at the various colleges, hospitals
and foundations in this area. Our office assists these same people with
information in many technical aspects of their stay, as well as permanent
residence that many of which later become concerned.
But they only account for a certain percentage of the 5,581 services
that we perform for 3,327 clients; the rest being permanent resident aliens
and citizens of the United States.
Due to his ability to speak the Polish Language, the District Agent
again accompanied the Supervisor of Social Service and a Social Worker from
SPRINGFIELD OFFICE
On June 30, 1967, the Division of Immigration and Americanization com-
pleted fifty years of service to residents of the Commonwealth. To this
Agent who has been with the Division the major portion of these years with
assignments at Boston, New Bedford and Springfield, it has been a most
rewarding experience to have assisted and guided nearly a quarter of a
million residents of our state so that adjustment to their environment may
result to the benefit of the state.
During the past fiscal year, 3832 services were given to residents of
forty-six localities in Berkshire, Franklin, Hampden and Hampshire counties.
Forty-one individuals, former residents of this State now residing in other
parts of the country, communicated with us seeking information and advice
promised to them as a result of our contacts with them when they first came
here to reside in our area.
Letters of welcome to new immigrants were sent to 856 families advising
them of our services to the foreign-born and inviting them to seek our
assistance at any time. Replies were received from them seeking information
in matters pertaining to their desire to become citizens, the reuniting of
members of their immediate families still residing abroad and regulations
pertaining to Selective Service registrations.
Since the opening of EXPO 67 we have been deluged with inquiries from
both citizens and aliens seeking advice about both the Canadian and United
States Immigration Regulations for entry to Canada and reentering the United
States.
Immigration service continued to be the bulk of our work. Explanation
of laws and the proper procedures to individuals interested in bringing
relatives or friends to live in the United States was time-consuming and very
difficult to us when it concerned individuals coming from abroad required to
obtain alien employment certification. In most instances, applicants had
received information from relatives or friends abroad stating - ,T I now
understand that if I have a letter guaranteeing to me that a job is waiting
for me, I will be permitted to immediately go to the United States". As
the majority of the intended immigrants were unskilled, it has been practi-
cally impossible to find employment for them.
This past April, one of our cases pending before the United States
Immigration Service since 1963 was brought to a successful conclusion and
the alien was finally granted adjustment of his status under Section 245 of
the Immigration and Naturalization Act. This case concerned a young man,
native of Italy, born in September 1942, permanent resident of the United
States since July 1956, found deportable having been convicted for criminal
offenses committed after his entry.
We assisted 30 Cuban parolees admitted subsequent to January 1, 1959
and physically present in the United States for at least two years, in ad-
justing to permanent residence under P.L. 89-732 Act of November 2, 1966.
The majority of them were highly educated or technically skilled persons
who have been unable to engage in their professions or technical field
because they were only temporary residents. They were most appreciative of
the opportunity given them by the United States Government to adjust their
status. One of these cases concerned a man who has found it difficult to
manage to provide for his wife and six children in the manner to which they
were accustomed before entering this country. He had served in both the
Cuban and United States Air Forces and while there had become a skilled
airplane mechanic. Although his talent is needed, a nearby concern engaged
in airplane manufacture could not accept him due to the fact they they are
engaged in government work. It is also interesting to note that the spouse
of this man was born in the United States, was taken to Cuba at a tender age,
voted in a political election in that country, was admitted to the United
States as a Cuban parolee and last March had her status adjusted to a per-
manent resident. As a result of the United States Supreme Court decision of
May 29, 1967 in the case of Afroyim v. Rusk , she may now be considered a
citizen. We corresponded with the United States Department of State concern-
ing her loss of United States Nationality. As a result of information re-
ceived from them, we have corresponded with the United States Naturalization
Service for an adjustment of her status. A favorable decision in her case
will enable her to seek employment at the above-mentioned concern, permit
her husband to immediately apply for citizenship and permit her minor chil-
dren to derive citizenship through parents.
Since the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of
Afroyim v. Rusk on May 29, 1967, we have corresponded with the United States
Department of State, Washington, D.C. on other cases requesting a review of
loss of nationality by voting in foreign elections. Subsequently, we have
been advised that certificates of loss of nationality of United States have
been vacated and contact should be made with the United States Naturaliza-
tion Service for adjustment of status of the individuals. There is no doubt
that we will be called upon to assist numerous individuals with similar
problems during this coming year.
The Agent has attended final naturalization hearings and has enjoyed
the privilege of meeting with the naturalization examiner, clerk of court
and the Judge sitting at the various sessions. At the conclusion of these
court hearings, former clients have approached the Agent in the court for
the purpose of seeking further advice and assistance of the office in either
sponsoring relatives or obtaining certificates of citizenship for their
children.
All public and private agencies with whom we have been associated
having interest in problems of the foreign-born, have been most cooperative.
Through the year we have had contacts with the Adult Education Program
and have furnished evening classes with booklets for use of adults preparing
for citizenship. It must be pointed out that a fine spirit of cooperation
with us was shown by the offices of the United States Immigration and
Naturalization Service at Springfield and Boston.
LAWRENCE OFFICE
The upward trend of services rendered by the Lawrence District Office
continued during fiscal year 1966-67. Although the figure of 6,549 services
for 1966 was an all-time high, an additional 694 services were rendered dur-
ing this past fiscal year for a total of 7,243.
Services for Cubans continue to pl£.y a major part of our work. With the
amendment to the law whereby Cuban refugees can adjust their status to that
of permanent residents without having to leave the country, our office was
kept busy completing forms and explaining procedures. Furthermore, we are
continuing to complete Family Status Cards for Cubans to bring their relatives
from Cuba under the Air-lift which has been in effect since December, 1965.
The liberalization of the immigration laws and the easing of quota re-
strictions also is serving to increase our workload. Relatives from Italy
and Greece, expecially, who never dreamed they would live to see America are
coming in ever increasing numbers. It is a source of satisfaction to us to
realize we had a part in reuniting these families, many of whom have been
separated for years.
"Reverse restrictions", if a phrase may be coined,, are continuing to
plague our friends from Canada and other Western Hemisphere countries because
of labor clearances. Where it was so easy to bring brothers and sisters from
Canada, Mexico and other Western Hemisphere countries, and so difficult to
bring them from Greece and Italy, the reverse is true now. This will con-
tinue until a report by a special committee is made in Washington regarding
Western Hemisphere immigration. It is hoped that these restrictions will be
eased,
A large part of our work this past year dealt with the completion of
forms to bring persons with needed skills to the United States. We have been
working closely with a large manufacturing firm in Lowell who need skilled
workers.
Our office was also busy during the past year with applications for
citizenship. This Agent attended all the naturalization sessions in Lowell
and in Lawrence, and again, it was most satisfying to see the pride and
happiness in the faces of many whom we assisted as they achieved the coveted
goal of United States citizenship.
Other services included the translation of documents from French, German,
Arabic and Italian; the completion of applications for United States pass-
ports and the referral of newcomers with problems other than immigration and
citizenship to the proper resources.
Our relations with public and private agencies both at home and abroad
continue to be excellent and we constantly receive their full cooperation in
behalf of our clients.
FALL RIVER OFFICE
The Fall River Branch Office terminated its fiscal year 1967 with a
total of 4,394 services rendered to individuals residing in 39 separate
cities and towns in Southeastern Massachusetts* In classifying and records
ing the work at this office we used the basis of services and that of a
client count which numbered a total of 2,253 individuals served* These ser-
vices dealt exclusively with immigration and citizenship laws which are of
a complex nature and vague to the ordinary lay person who has not studied
or dealt in this field as he would not be familiar with the comprehensive
interpretations of all the various laws*
W »th President Johnson l s signature on October 3, 1965, H. R. 2580
became Public Law 89-236* When the President signed this bill at the foot
of the Statue of Liberty it abolished a national origins quota system and
eliminated discrimination because of race, creed or national origin* With
the revision of the immigration law, numerous built-in equities were created
thus liberalizing immigration quotas*
During the past fiscal year, the impact of these new immigration laws
were highly visible in the area of Southeastern Massachusetts. Approxima-
tely 5,000 new immigrants settled and made their homes in the areas of Fall
River, New Bedford, Taunton, the Attleboro's and surrounding towns and are
continuing to arrive. These newcomers are joining our society for the first
time and are sent a letter of welcome from the Fall River Branch Office
explaining that if they have a problem concerning citizenship or immigra-
tion they are invited to call or write this office* The response has been
favorable and reasonably successful*
Forty-eight separate nationalities were served in the Fall River
Office of the Division.
Leading this ethnic group, as it has been for the past twenty years,
were natives of Portugal. There was also an increase in Polish immigration
during the past fiscal year due to relaxing of the Polish exit visa authori-
zing Polish nationals to emigrate to the United States.
There were 200 naturalization applications completed in this Division
Office along with 41 applications for certificate of citizenship. There-
fore, it shows that citizenship in the southeastern area is a highly valued
asset to the community.
The Fall River Branch Office of the Division, with a weekly call to
New Bedford, is there to give competent service to United states citizens
and aliens, oldcamsrs and new, in their problems of immigration, naturaliza-
tion, travel documents, correspondence with local, state and federal offices
and their numerous other problems.
g
H
CO
O
CO
STATISTICAL DETAI
Services Given
For the Fiscal Year 7/1/66-6/30/67
INFORMAT I ON
Booklets, Forms, Blanks
Ci tizenship "
Immigration
T r ave 1
Other
FORMS FILLED
Change of Address (AR-11)
Consulate Biographic Form (DSP-70)
Visa Registration (FS497-497A)
6413
662
342
5064
98
247
6250
241
to
>
H
;734
467
579
607
11
70
1103
35
73
Immig. Visa Application (FS-510)
Notice as Representative (G-28)
Annual Address Report (1-53) ~~
Lost Alien Reg, Card (1-90)
Visa Petition-Temp. Help (I-129B)
Visa Petition-Close Relative(I-130)
Reentry Permit (1-131) '
133
112
250
437
249
Skilled Worker Petition (1-140)
Permit to Return after Depor. (1-212)
Suspension of Deportation (I-256A)
Notice of Filing Brief (I-290B)
Foreign Police Clearance (1-484)
Registry form to make Record (1-485)
Perm. Residence Application (1-485)
Change Status to Student (1-506)
Extension of time for Visitor (1-539)
Legal Residence Information
sent to Consuls (1-550)
Petition under Orphans Act (1-600)
Waiver of Excludability (1-601)
Waiver under Exchange Act (I-612)__
Other Immigration Forms
883
174
53
36
236
30
281
237
12
50
180
U
z
a
OS
<
-4-
Q
i
H
fa
O
2
M
a
a*
CO
w
H
CO
u
a
o
5
3517
195
594
2265
272
191
1639
48
23
48
63
43
428
25
180
33
43
45
63
11
Declaration of Intention (N-300)
Petition for Naturalization (N-400)
Repatriation of American born
Citizen (N-401)
Petition for Nat'l.of Child (N-402)__
Duplicate Nat'l. Certificate (N-565)
Proof of Citizenship for use
Abroad (N- 577)
Verification of Arrival (N-585)
Derivative Citizenship Cert.(N-600)
Other Naturalization Forms
Cuban Ad justment-Residence( I-485A)
Biographic Information (G-325A)
27
18
80
979
54
87
98
197
394
909
198
29
176
16
54
7
48
76
43
44
11
158
2254
292
783
950
164
65
755
90
(fl
H
O
H
.i
ALL (OFFICES
3205
404
817
1447
623
1058
35
4
25
110
57
46
8
8
37
19
11
11
41
10
148
28
21
53
153
170
22
73
3-
20
214
33
144
42
20
101
12
13
15
172
8
15
37
80
23
34
17,213
2,020
2,915
10,333
1,168
577
10,805
469
104
195
187
321
1,369
397
1,429
245
158
39
18
357
47
558
322
19
102
121
1,667
103
133
129
376
119
500
1,264
EXECUTION OF AFFIDAVITS^
Affidavit of Support
Affidavit of Facts
Certificate of Identity_
U.S. S. R. Exit Permit [
Polish Assurance
Other Notarial
Cuban Assurance
Labor Clearance (ES-575)
OTHER SERVICES
Change of Status (Cards)
Appearance at Hearings
Interpretation & Translation^
Letters "
Other
5
H
O
CQ
1812
1391
77
38
>
DC
n
309
120
22
63
147
13
74
8009
539
120
167
U
ca
a
603
244
96
28
123
Q
J
tel
OS
H
(I)
fa
H
s
a
H
u
«
os
0.
o
w
3
138
90
34
680
49
8
69
1355
53
1668
5675
13
559
51
230
45
331
208
17
43
60
320
52
986
86
276
736
52
255
425
<
H
O
H
3,195
2,053
214
17
42
135
542
47
145
11*109
745
132
2^166
7,921
145
NEWCOMER INTERVIEW.
1500
566
129
356
161
TOTALS
33,984
4,394
7,243
3,832
5,581
2,712
45,034
.
Si I
ETHNIC AND NATIONALITY
S SPRING-
5 FIELD
i
s
TICS
H
,o
Albania
51
3
143
197
Algeria
14
-
-
1
-
15
Antigua
19
-
-
m
-
19
Arabia
Argentina
169
10
6
7
8
200
Armenia (R. or T.)
23
-
57
2
91
173
Aruba
2
-
-
•
-
2
Australia
22
a*
7
3
26
58
Austria
69
2
15
22
10
118
Bahamas
11
-
-
-
-
11
Barbados
355
-
-
44
4
403
Belgium
61
mU
2
28
9
100
Bermuda
36
1
-
10
16
13
Bolivia
28
-
-
1
-
29
Brazil
108
21
39
9
4
187
Br* Guiana
25
mm
-
4
1
30
Bulgaria
16
-
2
-
6
24
Canada
1,720
146
1,006
498
433
3,803
Ceylon
8
— ,.
-
-
-
8
Chile
28
*••
M s
2
1
31
China
749
165
42
20
65
1,041
Colombia
236
2
12
7
53
310
Costa Rica
268
-
53
m
3
324
Cuba
2,832
2
909
186
269
4,198
Cyprus
1
•
25
1
-
27
Czechoslovakia
79
3
21
6
13
122
Danzig
15
-
-
•
1
16
Denmark
22
4
10
3
5
44
Dominican Republic
94
•
140
2
4
240
Ecuador
56
1
96
21
12
186
Egypt_
81
4
13
a
20
118
El Salvador
23
•
-
•
-
23
England
488
82
108
203
139
1,020
Estonia
9
•
1
-
1
11
Finland
34
•
2
8
43
87
Formosa
24
-
•
3
9
36
France
174
45
67
45
51
382
Germany
502
70
233
249
157
1,211
Ghana
7
6
•
—
1
14
Greece
1,531
33
848
191
370
2,973
Guatemala
142
7
9
-
-
158
Haiti
334
m.
5
8
4
351
Honduras
306
m
35
1
3
345
Hong Kong
31
2
31
-
15
79
Hungary
128
4
57
19
30
238
Iceland
-
-
-
2
-
2
India
61
4
78
17
90
250
Indonesia
56
8
4
26
15
109
Iran
76
•
13
12
14
115
Iraq__
21
•
9
-
5
35
Ireland
1,003
20
32
97
97
1,249
Israel
37-
-
10
9
34
90
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67,
68.
69_
70.
71.
72*
73.
74.
7S*
76.
77.
?8*
79*
80.
81..
82.
83.
34.
85.
86.
87.
88,
89.
90..
91.
92.
93.
94.
95,
96.
97.
98.
99.
1O0.
101.
102.
103.
Italy
Jamaica^
Japan
Jordan^
Kenya
Korea
Latvia^
Lebanon^
Liber ia_
Libya
Lithuania^
Macau
Malaysia^
Mexico
Montserrat^
Morocco
Netherlands^
New Zealand^
Nicaragua
Norway
Other Countries^
Pakista n
Palestine
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines^
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico_
Rumani a
Scotland
South Africa^
Spai n
St. Lucia
Sudan
Sweden
Switzerland^
Syria_
Thailand^
Trinidad
Turkey
Ukraine
U.S.S.R._
United State s^
Uruguay "
Venezue 1 a
Vietnam
Wales
2
O
H
O
m
4 4 106
418
68
53
20
fit. «
57
17
43
126
104
42
199
81
222
12
77
21
19
64
52
45
u
§
3
1.123
13
38
530
30
118
110
12
20
114
12
104
394
1,108
1.407
88
96
8
99
36
74
101
90
299
24
279
1,429
37
11
8
West Indies (Other)
Yugoslavia
106
97
TOTALS
23.984
4
69
223
2,735
29
6
397
4^394
i .
§ a
Q. Hi
333
302
60
21
20
11
10
19
400
357
8
11
51
25
14
48
30
29
354
11
4
7^243
LI fc I III I I
41
12
11
3
I
1,037
36
43
33
71
84
19
52
17
10
12
13
28
332
144
52
8
26
8
11
23
45
479
24
23
3,832
660
21
19
29
11
52
11
90
27
830
12
48
5,581
8
H
6,656
762
201
68
21
135
131
770
42
319
6
229
222
23
150
33
21
199
73
28
49
159
24
122
502
2 X 723
4,664_
14
128
233
99,
167
10
;04
451_
28
386
3j489
-^38
34
10.
&
130,
179
45,034^
7/1/66-6/30/67
BOSTON
FALL
RIVER
LAWRENCE
SPRING-
FIELD
WOR-
CESTER
TOTALS
5
RESIDENCE OF APPLICANTS
Abington
5
Acton
15
-
_
_
-
15
Acushnet
-
8
—
_
-
8
Adams
-
—
—
9
-
9
Agawam
-
-
_
85
-
85
Amesbury
1
-
14
—
-
15
Amherst
22
-
i —
27
-
49
Andover
3
—
141
—
-
144
Arlington
303
—
6
—
-
309
Ashfield
1
—
a.
_
-
1
Ashland
17
-
_
—
-
17
Attleboro
25
69
1
-
-
95
Auburn
2
—
_
-
64
66
Avon
11
—
—
—
-
11
Ayer
30
—
10
—
1
41
Barnstable
22
2
1
25
Barre
-
-
—
-
16
16
Bedford
29
—
»
-
. -
29
Belcher town
-
-
-
15
-
15
Bellingham
7
4
—
-
-
11
Belmont
212
—
—
-
-
212
Beverly
27
—
4
-
-
31
Billerica
40
—
15
-
-
55
Blandford
-
—
—
1
-
1
Boston
11,290
21
124
-
44
11,479
Bourne
24
9
-
-
-
33
Boxford
3
-
-
-
-
3
Boylston
-
-
-
-
11
. 11
Braintree
55
-
6
-
-
61
Bridgewater
56
28
—
-
-
84
Brimf ield
-
-
-
3
-
3
Brockton
185
1
7
-
-
193
Brookf ield
1
-
-
1
32
34
Brookline
858
-
9
-
-
867
Burlington
102
-
-
-
-
102
Cambridge
1,576
8
15
1,599
Canton
54
-
-
-
-
54
Carlisle
1
-
3
-
-
3
Carver
8
-
-
-
-
8
Charlton
-
-
-
-
29
29
Chelmsford
23
-
36
-
- . .
59
Chelsea
454
-
12
-
8
474
Chester
-
-
-
3
-
3
Chicopee
9
-
-
556
-
565
Clinton
-
-
-
-
116
116
Cohasset
6
-
-
-
-
6
Concord
36
-
4
-
-
40
Conway
-
-
-
5
-
5
BOSTON
FALL
RIVER
LAWRENCE
SPRING-
FIELD
WOR-
CESTER
TOTAL
Danvers
31
23
54
Dartmouth
4
174
-
-
-
178
Dedham
101
-
1
-
3
105
Deerfield
-
—
—
4
-
4
Dennis
1
—
—
-
-
1
Dighton
-
7
—
-
-
7
Douglas
-
-
-
-
13
13
Dover
6
—
—
-
-
6
Dracut
4
-
93
-
-
97
Dudley
1
-
-
-
101
102
Duxbury
3
-
-
-
-
3
East Bridge water
3
3
East Brookfield
-
-
-
-
2
2
East Longmeadow
-
-
-
49
-
49
Easthampton
-
-
—
29
-
29
Easton
9
-
—
-
-
9
Egremont
1
—
—
—
-
1
Essex
1
-
-
-
-
1
Everett
411
-
6
-
-
417
Fairhaven
8
161
169
Fall River
37
2,172
2
-
2
2,213
Falmouth
28
66
-
-
-
94
Fitchburg
13
-
-
-
66
79
Foxborough
16
-
-
-
-
16
Framingham
135
-
7
-
2
144
Franklin
33
-
-
—
18
51
Freetown
-
11
-
-
-
11
Gardner
1
61
62
Georgetown
2
-
2
-
-
4
Gloucester
166
-
-
-
-
166
Grafton
5
-
-
-
98
103
Granby
-
-
-
8
-
8
Granville
-
-
-
2
-
2
Great Barrington
-
-
-
2
-
2
Greenfield
1
-
-
8
-
9
Groton
8
-
1
-
-
9
Grove land
4
-
-
-
-
4
Hadley
1
1
Halifax
7
-
-
-
-
7
Hamilton
28
-
-
-
-
28
Hampden
-
-
-
10
-
10
Hanove r
3
—
-
-
-
3
Hanson
11
-
-
-
-
11
Hardwick
-
-
-
-
13
13
Harvard
1
-
2
-
-
3
Harwich
6
—
-
-
-
6
Haverhill
36
-
364
-
-
400
Hingham
20
-
-
-
-
20
BOSTON
FALL
•RIVER
LAWRENCE
SPRING-
FIELD
WOR-
CESTER
TOTAL
Ho lb rook
19
19
Holden
-
—
—
—
54
54
Holliston
46
—
—
_
-
46
Hoi yoke
4
—
—
316
-
320
Hope dale
2
—
—
—
-
2
Hudson
18
—
3
-
34
55
Hull
35
_
-
—
-
35
Ipswich
62
62
Kingston
29
6
.
35
Lake vi lie
1
1
Lancaster
18
—
_
-
95
113
Lawrence
40
—
3.443
-
-
3,483
Lee
—
—
11
-
11
Leicester
-
—
—
2
62
64
Lenox
1
—
—
3
-
4
Leominster
8
—
—
1
40
49
Lexington
96
—
—
-
-
96
Lincoln
27
—
_
-
-
27
Littleton
12
—
4
-
-
16
Longmeadow
1
—
—
71
-
72
Lowell
57
—
1,947
-
-
2,004
Ludlow
-
—
131
-
131
Lynn
394
-
9
-
2
405
Lynnf ield
7
—
—
-
-
7
Maiden
260
3
.
263
Manchester
9
—
—
-
-
9
Mansfield
10
-
-
-
-
10
Marblehead
24
—
-
-
-
24
Marion
1
3
2
-
-
6
Marlborough
41
—
-
-
61
102
Mar shf ield
45
-
—
-
-
45
Mashpee
-
1
-
-
-
1
Mattapoisett
-
15
—
-
-
15
Maynard
18
-
-
-
-
18
Me df ield
10
-
-
-
-
10
Medford
363
-
-
-
-
363
Medway
22
-
-
-
-
22
Melrose
121
-
-
-
1
122
Merrimac
-
-
5
-
-
5
Methuen
14
-
384
-
-
398
Middleborough
10
5
-
-
1
16
Middleton
12
-
-
-
-
12
Milford
23
-
-
-
142
165
Millbury
1
-
-
-
63
64
Millis
1
-
-
-
-
1
Milton
51-
-
-
-
-
51
Monson
-
-
-
9
-
9
Montague
9
-
-
1
-
10
BOSTON
FALL
RIVER
LAWRENCE
SPRING-
FIELD
WOR-
CESTER
TOTAL
Nahant
15
15
Nantucket
-
5
—
-
-
5
Natick
131
-
2
-
4
137
Needham
61
-
—
-
-
61
New Bedford
27
1,164
—
-
-
1,191
New Braintree
-
—
—
-
1
1
New Marlborough
-
—
—
5
-
5
Newbury
-
-
5
-
-
5
Newburyport
-
-
5
-
-
5
Newton
628
—
20
-
-
648
Norfolk
7
_
—
—
-
7
North Adams
1
—
-
-
-
1
North Andover
3
—
67
-
-
70
North Attleborough
9
11
-
-
-
20
North Brookfield
—
—
—
-
8
8
North Reading
30
—
—
-
-
30
Northampton
2
—
-
27
-
29
Northborough
—
—
-
-
97
97
Northbridge
4
—
-
-
24
28
Norton
1
10
-
-
-
11
Norwood
112
—
6
-
-
118
Oak Bluffs
1
1
Oxford
—
—
m
-
31
31
Palmer
57
57
Paxton
1
—
—
-
21
22
Peabody
138
-
6
-
2
146
Pembroke
24
—
-
-
-
24
Pepperell
5
—
1
-
-
6
Petersham
—
—
-
-
3
3
Pittsfield
12
_
-
10
-
22
Plainville
3
—
-
-
-
3
Plymouth
25
—
—
-
-
25
Province town
5
7
—
-
-
12
Quincy
306
2
.
308
Randolph
29
4
5
38
Raynham
1
4
-
-
-
5
Reading
43
-
10
-
-
53
Re hobo th
1
13
-
-
-
14
Revere
189
-
2
-
-
191
Rochester
—
3
-
-
-
3
Rockland
20
-
-
-
-
20
Rockport
7
—
1
-
-
8
Rowley
4
-
-
-
-
4
Rutland
-
-
-
-
32
32
Salem
125
1
2
128
Salisbury
-
-
4
-
-
4
Sandwich
2
3
—
—
-
5
BOSTON
FALL
RIVER
LAWRENCE
SPRING-
FIELD
WOR
CESTER
TOTAL
Saugus
48
18
66
Scituate
70
-
—
—
-
70
Seekonk
1
3
_
—
-
4
Sharon
15
—
_
_
-
15
Sheffield
-
—
—
1
-
1
Sherborn
31
—
—
_
-
31
Shirley
6
-
—
—
-
6
Shrews bury_^
1
—
—
—
231
232
Somerset
1
120
_
_
-
121
Some rvi lie
1,060
—
-
—
2
1,062
South Hadley
-
_
49
-
49
Southampton
-
—
_
2
-
2
Southborough
6
—
_
—
1
7
Southbridge
2
—
_
2
135
139
Southwick
-
—
_
16
-
16
Spencer
-
_
_
-
39
39
Springfield
18
—
—
1,935
-
1,953
Sterling
-
—
—
-
2
2
Stockbridge
-
—
_
2
-
2
Stoneham
77
—
-
-
-
77
Stoughton
51
8
2
-
-
61
Stow
4
—
—
—
-
4
Sturbridge
1
—
—
-
20
21
Sudbury
22
—
—
-
-
22
Sunderland
-
—
—
1
-
1
Sutton
-
—
—
-
1
1
Swampscott
81
—
—
-
-
81
Swansea
-
58
-
-
-
58
Taunton
34
127
161
Templeton
-
-
—
-
1
1
Tewksbury
15
—
54
-
-
69
Tisbury
1
-
-
-
-
1
Topsfield
7
-
i
-
7
Truro
2
-
—
-
-
2
Tyngsborough
-
—
7
-
-
7
Tyringham
-
—
—
-
1
1
Upton
8
8
Uxbridge
3
—
—
1
52
56
Wakefield
48
48
Wales
1
-
—
-
-
1
Walpole
55
-
-
-
-
55
Waltham
346
-
2
-
-
348
Ware
-
-
1
5
4
10
Wareham
6
25
-
-
-
31
Warwick
-
-
-
3
4
7
Watertown
522
-
2
-
-
524
Way land
16
-
-
-
7
23
Webster
5
-
-
-
197
202
Wellesley
82
-
-
-
-
82
Wenham
13
-
-
-
-
13
BOSTON
FALL
RIVER
LAWRENCE
SPRING-
FIELD ■:
WOR-
CESTER
TOTAL
West Boylston
71
71
West Bridgewater
11
—
—
-
-
11
West Brookfield
1
-
—
-
7 1 8
West Newbury
1
—
-
-
_
1
West Springfield
-
-
-
141
-
141
Westborough
1
-
-
-
51
52
Westfield
2
-
-
136
1
139
Vvtstford
-
—
20
-
-
20
Westminster
-
-
-
-
1
1
Weston
24
-
1
-
-
25
Westport
1
57
-
-
-
58
We st wood
40
—
—
-
-
40
Weymouth
54
—
4
-
-
58
Whitman
10
—
—
-
-
10
Wilbraham
-
-
-
33
-
33
Williamsburg
1
—
-
-
-
1
Williamstown
-
-
—
2
-
2
Wilmington
24
—
1
—
-
25
Winchendon
1
—
-
-
1
2
Winchester
42
—
6
-
-
48
Winthrop
43
-
2
-
-
45
Woburn
113
-
8
-
-
121
Worcester
37
-
17
-
3 T 240
3,294
Wrentham-
7
6
—
-
-
13
Yarmouth
3
5
8
Out of State
366
258
41
9
674
TOTAL
23,984
4,394
7,243
3,832
5,581
45^034
■
■ ■ I ■ ttf
^M
BBBI BBBI - BJ '- '
' I Bl w < G£iB2
B ijlHj ■ £»52
IKn Us •'."
VK>
& I ■
1
BBH
■■■
IffwSDB
HI 1
>5*« •-.■•• '
■ I
y,-;, H H
<V**'V ; -V V" gz
1 1 BvftJ
MP"
■
■BJE '"'A ™ ■-. i * Bl t >.* ' — f-. ■
IJJJJJ H
BlBlBlBlBlBlBfl I SsE
■M
BlJlJlJlJlJl ■
BJBJ ■■■
BBBBH BBJ9 B^BBBBI
■ 1BJ
a v ■■■ >v-*B9HKfeJu .'». I
^v^ 8fcaX9
■■J BBJ I ■
■ ■
BKlAM
■
■ ,
■lll^Bl
S9 BBS
Bl BBBJ Br«s«^3»E*rC
■ BBfiBl 9n&
I bboH H
$M £1
■
^BM
bibI
BapJapJI bbb
BBB
■
' BM~
& BM ■
■ >
BIBBi
■■Bl Sraff&
,*•■**• *- s - H'i bun
bIbI
bbI
Be
bbbji
SB'
TVNews
OpenLibrary